Family court
What actually makes a co-parenting message court-admissible.
Screenshots get challenged. Timestamps get questioned. Here is what family courts actually look for in a digital communication record, and how to make sure the one you bring holds up.
Read article →
Children's rights
Children's rights in co-parenting: what they are, and what they are not.
Children have a legal and moral right to two functioning parents and a calm environment. Here is what that looks like in practice, and what it does not.
Read article →
Parents' rights
Parents' rights in family court: what you keep, and what you trade.
Filing in family court does not erase your rights as a parent. Here is a plain-language guide to what those rights are, where they bend, and how to protect them.
Read article →
Co-parenting
Calm communication when the other parent is not calm.
You cannot control how the other parent writes. You can control what you send, how it lands, and what the record shows. Here is a practical guide.
Read article →
Children's rights
What children of different ages actually understand about separation.
Infants do not understand divorce. Adolescents understand it too well. A research-grounded look at how children at each developmental stage process a parental separation, what helps, and what causes lasting harm.
Read article →
Children's rights
What the research actually says about shielding children from conflict.
Forty years of research keeps arriving at the same finding: it is the conflict between parents, not the separation itself, that does most of the damage to children. Here is what the evidence shows, and what it asks of parents.
Read article →
Parents' rights
Recognizing coercive control after separation.
Separation is not a finish line for abuse. For survivors of coercive control, it is often the most dangerous phase. Here is what the research shows about how coercive control continues, the tactics it uses, and why family courts so often miss it.
Read article →
Co-parenting
Parallel parenting: when cooperative coparenting isn't safe or possible.
Some separations cannot support real cooperation. Parallel parenting is the research-grounded alternative: deliberate disengagement, written-only communication, neutral exchanges, and a parenting plan detailed enough that the parents almost never need to talk.
Read article →
Family court
How a custody evaluation actually works.
A custody evaluation is one of the most consequential professional assessments a family can undergo. Here is how they are ordered, who conducts them, what they involve, how courts use them, and the documented limits parents should understand going in.
Read article →
Family court
What judges actually weigh when they decide custody.
Every state's custody statute invokes the 'best interests of the child.' Here is what that standard actually contains, how it has evolved, the typical factors judges weigh, the documented criticisms, and the protections that have been built in for survivors of domestic violence.
Read article →
Family court
Autistic children in family court: rights, failures, and what the evidence says about self-injury.
Autistic children have specific legal rights in custody proceedings, those rights are routinely overlooked, and self-injurious behavior is not an innate feature of autism but a learned response to identifiable causes. A careful look at the statutes, the documented failures, and the research base.
Read article →
Parents' rights
Autistic adults in family court: parental fitness, custody, and the unequal protection of the law.
Family court is where autistic adults most often lose what matters most — their children, their homes, their decisional authority. A close look at how custody evaluations, child-welfare proceedings, and guardianship hearings misread autistic presentation, with historical context and the complementary failures in police encounters, interrogation, criminal court, jury service, and employment that feed into the same pattern.
Read article →
Family court
Alienation vs. estrangement: what the research actually says.
"Parental alienation" is one of the most contested terms in family court. Here is what the empirical literature supports, what it does not, and how courts are starting to tell the difference between a child who has been turned against a parent and a child who has reasons.
Read article →
Family court
Relocation and move-away cases: the legal standards that decide them.
When one parent wants to move with the children, the law in most states asks a specific set of questions before saying yes or no. Here is the framework, the leading cases, and what actually moves the needle.
Read article →
Family court
False allegations in custody: what the data shows, and what courts get wrong.
Both deliberately false reports and reflexive disbelief of true ones cause real harm. Here is what the empirical literature on rates, motivations, and detection actually says.
Read article →
Family court
Guardians ad litem, supervised visitation, and reunification therapy: what they are and what they are not.
Three of the most powerful third-party roles in family court — and three of the least well understood. Here is what each one does, what training is actually required, and what the research supports.
Read article →
Family court
Domestic violence in custody: the law, the research, and Kayden's Law.
Family courts now have explicit federal direction on how to handle custody cases involving domestic violence. Here is what changed in 2022, what the research established before it, and what implementation looks like in practice.
Read article →
Children's rights
High-conflict personalities and the children caught between them.
Some custody cases stay hot for years not because the issues are unresolved but because at least one parent has a personality structure that makes resolution difficult. Here is what the research shows about the effect on children.
Read article →
Parents' rights
LGBTQ+ parents in family court: where the law is settled, and where it isn't.
Marriage equality answered some questions. Custody, parentage, and ART cases keep raising new ones. Here is the current state of the law for LGBTQ+ parents in US family courts.
Read article →
Parents' rights
Military families and custody: the SCRA, the UDPCVA, and the deployment problem.
Service members face a custody system that was not designed for deployment, PCS moves, or recall. Two pieces of federal and uniform law are the principal protections.
Read article →
Family court
Grandparent visitation after Troxel: the constitutional limits.
In 2000 the Supreme Court reset the constitutional baseline for grandparent visitation statutes. Twenty-five years later, the state landscape it created is still being worked out.
Read article →
Family court
Substance use in custody: testing, treatment, and what courts actually do.
Alleged or admitted substance use is one of the most frequent issues in contested custody cases. The testing modalities, treatment expectations, and statutory frameworks vary more than parents usually realize.
Read article →